Aprenda a expressão "The Pot Calling the Kettle Black"
The case of Pot versus Black Kettle Hello pot, my name's kettle, pot, meet kettle. allusive and connotative meanings into the interpretation of the variant form. "The pot calling the kettle black" is a proverbial idiom that may be of Spanish origin of which . External links. The dictionary definition of pot calling the kettle black at Wiktionary. It means being a hypocrite. Therefore the phrase the pot calling the kettle black , or variations there off is ment as a sign oh pot, meet kettle!.
You may not modify, adapt, translate or create derivative works based upon the Software. You will not reverse engineer, decompile, disassemble or otherwise attempt to discover the source code of the Software except to the extent you may be expressly permitted to reverse engineer or decompile under applicable law.
Apple's own terms of service document covering all applications downloaded from the App Store, says in Section 10b: Those terms have previously even been unavailable for examination online.
Pot, meet kettle: a response to Steve Jobs’ letter on Flash
We are publishing them on fsf. The fact that H. Jobs himself explains the problems with giving up the freedom to use your computer and its software to another, when he says, "[Apple] cannot be at the mercy of a third party deciding if and when they will make our enhancements available to our developers.
If you buy an iPhone OS computer, there is no recourse if Apple makes a decision you do not like. You'll wait on Apple to approve or not approve the application with features you want to use, you'll never be assured that Apple won't remove the application once it's accepted, and you'll wait on Apple to implement any bug fixes or new features, or to take care of your security—even though it's ostensibly your platform, your computer, and part of your life.
Jobs has hit the nail on the head when describing the problems with Adobe, but not until after smashing his own thumb. Every criticism he makes of Adobe's proprietary approach applies equally to Apple, and every benefit attributed to the App Store can be had without it being a mandatory proprietary arrangement.
Apple can offer quality control and editorial selection over available free software, and encourage users to exclusively—but voluntarily—use their store.
Instead, Apple chooses to enforce legal restrictions, the transgression of which is punishable by criminal law, on users who want to make changes to their own computers, like installing free, non-Apple, software. Fortunately, the way out of the Adobe vs.
What does the phrase "pot meet kettle" mean? | Yahoo Answers
Apple cage match is straightforward, and exists already: To make things even better, we can continue urging Google to release their new media formatVP8, under a free license as well. The licenses for most software and other practical works are designed to take away your freedom to share and change the works.
By contrast, the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change all versions of a program—to make sure it remains free software for all its users. When Jobs defensively points to Apple's involvement in WebKit, he inadvertently makes the case for the superiority of free software over his own proprietary App Store approach.
WebKit is indeed free software, and Apple did help make it happen. But the success of WebKit is neither Apple's success alone in fact, some of its advances have been achieved in spite of some uncooperative behavior by Apple nor is it a result of their proprietary approach.
They are one contributor among others, and those others are able to contribute because the software is freely licensed. WebKit users are not at the mercy of Apple—the source code is available and can be legally modified, so anyone is entitled to make and distribute new features or fixes.
But, sadly, Jobs can't stand to let it be that—while the core of Safari is WebKit, it is engulfed in other proprietary code, giving Apple leverage we should reject. According to an article in the Jamaica Observer: Seaga took issue with the killing of residents of Tivoli, saying that the people who had arms had left the community.
So why are you continuing? Why you shooting people?
Outside of his accusations and what I believe was him trying to remove himself from liability for the issue, Mr. Seaga did make some good points regarding the operation. Such as where he stated that with regards to Bishop Blair's visit to Tivoli Gardens where he stated: Not using any analytical experiences he had from the previous incident in You don't just go there and hand poor people food and say 'okay sit down here until the next package come'.
They want to get out. That's what you must call for.
They want to be free. They want to be citizens with their rights.
What does the phrase "pot meet kettle" mean?
It's not a package of food they want. I am disappointed in him I also have to agree with Mr. Seaga that Bruce Golding really should resign because clearly "He cannot cope" with his current job and he simply "should not have intervened in the extradition process".
Adams also added that Seaga: Seaga has only himself to blame The prime minister of the land with all of the advisors came to the conclusion that it was necessary to go in there and get criminal gunmen.
- The pot calling the kettle black
- Access Denied
- What does pot meet kettle mean?